Posted in

The HORRORS of the M50 Ontos in Vietnam – Why Its Beehive Rounds Were Banned From Conversatio

February 1968, Hue City. Delta Company, 1st Battalion, 5th Marines is pinned at an intersection inside the Citadel. An NVA platoon owns a two-story building across the street. Overlapping machine guns, RPGs fire from every window. The Marines can’t go forward, they can’t pull back.

"
"

Men are down on the pavement, then they hear tracks. A vehicle rounds the corner. It’s small, absurdly small for something with six gun barrels jutting from its roof. It looks like someone welded a weapons depot onto a golf cart. The driver pulls it into line with the building. The gunner peers through his optics and fires a single .

50 caliber spotting round, one tracer. It flies in a flat arc and punches through the second story window, and the NVA platoon empties the building. Every fighter out the back exits, through the alleys, gone. In the words of the Marines watching, like cockroaches when the lights come on. The Ontos never fired its main guns.

A spotting tracer cleared the position because by February ’68, every NVA soldier in Hue had already seen what followed that tracer. They’d watched what happened to the buildings where men decided to stay. That reputation was earned one salvo at a time by a vehicle that had no business being in that city, in that war, or in the Marine Corps at all.

The Ontos wasn’t supposed to be there. It wasn’t designed for cities or for Vietnam. The army that originally commissioned it had already rejected it as a failure. The M50 Ontos started as a Cold War idea the army discarded. In the early ’50s, the Pentagon wanted a lightweight tank destroyer that could be parachuted into Europe to ambush Soviet armor.

Allis-Chalmers, a company that made farm equipment, won the contract and built a 9-ton prototype with six 106-mm recoilless rifles bolted to an external turret and armor so thin a heavy machine gun could punch through it. The army tested it at Aberdeen and called it a disaster. Too cramped. Only 18 rounds on board.

The turret traverse was barely 40°, and the reload process was genuinely insane. The loader had to climb outside, stand fully exposed, and wrestle 38-lb shells into breeches mounted above the hull while the enemy tried to kill him. For a conventional tank fight, the Ontos was a coffin on tracks. The army canceled the order.

The Marine Corps, perpetually underfunded and genetically incapable of turning down something with six guns on it, bought all 297. They named it Ontos, Greek for the thing, reportedly because no general wanted his actual name attached to it. Six M40A1C recoilless rifles, actual bore 105-mm designated 106 to prevent ammunition mix-ups with older incompatible rounds.

Each rifle paired with a .50 caliber spotting gun that fired a tracer ballistically matched to the main round. If the tracer hit, the 106 would hit the same spot. That’s what went through the window in Hue. That’s what cleared the building before the real weapons ever spoke. The rifles could fire individually, in pairs, or all six in rapid succession.

When all six went off at Aberdeen, the backblast knocked bricks out of nearby buildings and shattered car windows in the parking lot. Three ammunition types gave the Ontos its range of violence. HEAT rounds penetrated 16 in of armor and gutted bunkers from the inside. HEP rounds squashed flat against a wall before detonating, killing everyone on the other side through shockwave alone, then blowing 4-m holes through concrete when Marines needed a door where there wasn’t one.

And then, there was the round nobody wanted to face at close range, the beehive. Each flechette canister packed roughly 9,600 steel darts. A full six-gun salvo sent nearly 60,000 flechettes into the air in a fraction of a second. 9 tons, three-man crew, six guns that could level a city block, armor that could stop rifle fire and little else. The Marines loved it.

Vietnam should have killed the Ontos. It was designed to destroy Soviet tanks, and the NVA had almost none. A tank destroyer with nothing to destroy should have been sent home. But Vietnam wasn’t a war of armored columns on open plains. It was bunkers and jungle, fortified villages and rice paddies, ancient walled cities turned into interlocking fortresses.

The real problem wasn’t enemy armor, it was enemy infantry dug into positions that couldn’t be cracked by anything a rifle company carried, in terrain where 50-ton M48 Patton tanks sank to their hulls in monsoon mud. The Ontos didn’t sink. 9 tons skated across paddies that swallowed Pattons. It squeezed through alleys where tanks wedged between walls.

It crossed wooden bridges that would have splintered under anything heavier. And it carried six guns that could do to a bunker in 3 seconds what artillery needed 10 minutes and a radio call to accomplish. When a rifle platoon is pinned behind a rice paddy dike with a machine gun nest 30 m inside a tree line, the options narrow fast.

Call artillery, if the battery’s free, if clearance comes through, if the observer can talk rounds onto target before more men go down. Call Same problem, longer wait. Or call for the Ontos, which is already moving up the trail, doesn’t need clearance, and just needs a gunner with line of sight. Point it problem. Problem gets erased.

Marines across multiple engagements describe the same sequence. A few seconds of engine noise, then a salvo that turned the tree line, or the bunker, or the fortified wall into a question that had already been answered. Men who had been pinned for 20 minutes stood up and walked forward in the silence that followed. Built for a different war entirely, the Ontos had become exactly what the Marines needed, pocket artillery that kept pace with the infantry, and fired the instant someone pointed at a building.

The M48 Patton was a serious tank, 52 tons of steel, a 90-mm main gun, armor that could take a hit and keep moving. In a stand-up armored fight, there was no comparison. The Ontos wasn’t close. But Vietnam kept producing fights where the Patton’s strengths became liabilities. Inside a city like Hue, the streets were narrow enough that the tank’s size became a problem.

The 90-mm gun had limited elevation. It could demolish a wall at ground level, but angling up to engage a sniper in a second-floor window was a different challenge. The main gun’s fuse types weren’t optimized for the thick French colonial masonry the NVA had converted into fortifications. And the Patton’s weight meant it couldn’t follow infantry everywhere infantry needed to go.

The Ontos had none of those advantages. It also had none of those problems. Short enough, narrow enough, and light enough to follow Marines into spaces where tanks got stuck. Six guns that could aim directly at second-floor positions, HEP rounds built specifically to shatter masonry. Different tools for different jobs.

Read More