Posted in

They Laughed When She Bought That Salt Ruined Land For $10 — Until Strange Grass Took Root In It

 

"
"

The auctioneer said it in front of maybe 40 people, and he didn’t lower his voice when he said it, “Honey, that ground hasn’t grown anything but salt crust and regret since 1987. You sure you know what you’re bidding on?” I was the only person under 60 at that auction. I was wearing my grandfather’s Carhartt, the brown one with the frayed left cuff, and I had a cashier’s check in the front pocket for $11,000, which was every cent I had pulled out of the savings account my grandfather had opened for me when I was 7 years old.

The account was at First Terrebonne Savings in Kessler County, Wisconsin. The banker who had processed the withdrawal that morning had asked me twice if I was sure. The land was 34 acres in the lower Kessler flood plain, about 4 miles southeast of the town of Millhaven on County Road G. It sat at the bottom of a long, gentle slope, and sometime in the late 1980s a drainage tile system had failed.

 Nobody could agree on exactly when or exactly whose fault, and for the better part of three decades the water table had pushed sodium up through the subsoil until the top 6 inches of that field looked, in certain morning lights, like the skin of something that had been left out too long, pale, cracked, wrong.

 The asking price at auction was $10,000. The parcel had been sitting in county tax limbo since 2019, when the last owner, an older man who had farmed the adjacent 200 acres, had died without a will that anyone could find. His nephew had driven up from Illinois, looked at the salt flat, and told the county clerk she was welcome to it.

 I raised my hand. The auctioneer repeated his question. I said yes, I knew what I was bidding on. A man in the second row, wide-shouldered, maybe 65, wearing a green Pioneer Seeds cap, turned around and looked at me the way you look at someone who has just said something in the wrong language. Nobody else bid.

 The gavel came down at $10,200. I paid the 200 in cash from my jacket pocket. The auctioneer shook my hand, and his grip was the kind that tests you a little, just a little, and I held it without adjusting. Driving back on County Road G, I pulled over once and got out and walked to the edge of the field.

 The October light was flat and white. The ground made a faint sound when I pressed my boot into it. Not quite a crunch, more like a sigh. Like something compressing that had been held tight for a long time. I crouched down and looked at it for a while. There was something growing near the northwest corner, low, gray-green, maybe 3 in tall, a plant I didn’t recognize.

 I took out my notebook and drew the shape of its leaves. I drove the rest of the way home with the heater broken and the window fogging from my breath, and I kept thinking about that plant. Not in an anxious way, more the way you think about a word you almost remember, circling it, not forcing it. The farmhouse was cold when I got back.

 I’d inherited it 11 months earlier, 18 days after my grandfather died in the upstairs bedroom where he’d been born. The house was a 1927 Craftsman on 4 acres of workable ground, and the rest, the 41 acres I’d been slowly piecing together since May, sat in parcels around it like a puzzle that had never been meant to fit.

 The salt field was the last piece, or the first, depending on how you looked at it. I made coffee and sat at the kitchen table with my notebook open. I’d drawn the leaf shape carefully, narrow, slightly cupped, the edges serrated in a pattern that was almost even but not quite, three leaflets to a stem, a faint silver cast to the underside that I’d noticed when the wind turned one over, I wrote.

Northwest corner, clay-salt mix, no visible moisture, plant present and apparently thriving. Then I went to the shelf in the back hall where my grandfather kept his farming books. He’d had 40 years in Crane County, Wisconsin, and he’d kept notes the way other men kept grudges, thoroughly and without letting go.

 Most of his books were published by the university extension. A few were hand bound, which he’d made himself from folded ledger paper and electrical tape, and labeled in his cramped handwriting along the spine. I pulled them all down and stacked them on the table. The third one I opened had a section on salt affected soils.

 He’d underlined two paragraphs in pencil and written a single word in the margin. The word was distichlis. I didn’t know it then. I had to look it up, which meant driving 4 miles to where the cell signal was strong enough, parking in the gravel lot of the Lutheran church on Route 45, and searching on my phone while a yellow dog watched me from the church steps.

Distichlis spicata. Inland saltgrass, native to North America. Grows on alkaline flats, salt marshes, and disturbed ground with high sodium content. Considered a nuisance by most farmers. Used by a small number of ranchers as emergency forage. Roots go down 18 inches in the right conditions. I sat with that for a minute.

 Then I scrolled further and found a research paper from Utah State, published 2019, about a company in Nevada running trials on distichlis as a commercial hay crop, specifically for horse operations that needed low potassium feed. The paper had a table of yield estimates. I read the numbers twice. I drove home.

 I got out my grandfather’s notebook again and looked at the word in the margin. His pencil had pressed hard. He’d known something. That night I couldn’t sleep. I lay in my grandfather’s bed, still his in my mind, still smelling faintly of the cedar block he kept in the dresser, and I stared at the ceiling and thought about potassium.

 Low potassium hay is a niche product. I knew that much from two semesters of agricultural science at Cascade Community College before I left. Horses with Cushing’s disease, horses with hip, horses with metabolic syndrome, their owners spend real money finding feed that won’t spike their electrolytes. The research paper from Utah State had been specific about this.

The trials were running on 40 acres outside of Elko. Yield projections were conservative, around two tons per acre per cutting with two cuttings possible in a good year, but the price per ton was not the price of ordinary hay. It was closer to the price of specialty alfalfa, sometimes higher. I did the math on the back of an envelope.

 I did it again to make sure I hadn’t made an error. 17 acres of salt flats. If salt grass would take on all 17, which was not guaranteed, not even close, and if I could get two cuttings in the second or third year after establishment, which the paper said was the typical timeline, and if the per ton price held anywhere near what the paper cited from 2019 market data, which was four years old by now and might have shifted in either direction, I stopped.

 I was doing what my grandfather called counting eggs before the shell cracked. I put the envelope down and picked up his notebook instead. I went back to the beginning where the handwriting was younger, the ink darker. He had bought this farm in April of 1971. He was 24 years old. The notes from that first spring were practical, fencing costs, a broken well pump, a neighbor who turned out to be reliable, another who turned out not to be.

 He wrote the names of both without comment, just a single check mark or an X beside each, his way of keeping score without editorializing. About 30 pages in, there was a section that surprised me. It wasn’t dated the way the others were. It was a list, not numbered, just indented of things that had failed in the first 3 years.

 A corn trial on the east field, a goat operation he’d started and abandoned, a greenhouse frame that collapsed under February snow. A partnership with someone whose name was marked with an X and crossed out so hard the pen had nearly torn the paper. He’d written one sentence after the list. The land tells you what it wants to grow.

 Your job is to listen before you argue. I sat with that longer than I’d sat with the yield projections. There was something in it that felt less like farming advice and more like something he’d decided about himself. Something that had cost him before he learned it. I turned the page. The next page was a hand-drawn map.

 Not a proper map, no compass rose, no scale bar, nothing a surveyor would recognize, just his handwriting in pencil dividing the farm’s 140 acres into rough polygons with labels scratched inside each one. West pasture, clay heavy, holds water. Upper field, decent. Orchard strip, ask about grafting. The southeast corner, which I’d always heard referred to as the salt flat, was labeled with two words that surprised me.

Not dead. Not dead, he hadn’t written. Problem area. Or loss. Or even someday. He’d written not dead. The same way you’d write it about an animal you weren’t ready to give up on. I pulled the map closer. In the margin beside the southeast label, in ink slightly darker than the pencil, added later I thought, was a single number.

7 years. 7 years. I didn’t know yet what that meant, but I wrote it in my own notebook, which I’d started keeping in March, because he’d kept one, and I figured I owed the land at at that much. I turned past the map and found three more years of entries, and then the writing changed. It wasn’t dramatic. He didn’t announce anything.

 The handwriting simply became less cramped, a little more patient on the page, the entries spaced out. Where before he’d written every few days, now he was writing once a week, sometimes less. And instead of recording problems, he started recording observations. Killdeer pair back at the ditch edge, second spring in a row.

Something is changing in the southeast corner. Pull samples in April. The old Italian neighbor says salt ground takes 7 years to forgive if you don’t fight it. There it was, 7 years. I stopped reading and looked out the barn window. The southeast field was about a quarter mile from where I was sitting.

 I hadn’t been out there yet, not properly, not with any intention. I’d walked the fence line once in my first week, just to understand the shape of what I had, and I’d seen the pale chalky soil and the thin patches of volunteer grass and thought, “Later. File that one under later.” But he hadn’t filed it under later.

 He’d been watching it from the first season, noting it, waiting on it. He’d bought this land in full knowledge of what was wrong with it, and then he’d started counting years instead of losses. The old Italian neighbor. I knew which family that meant. There was only one Italian family name in Garfield County that went back that far. The same name on the mailbox, 3/4 of a mile down the road, now belonging to a man in his 70s who had never once waved when I drove.

 Past, I marked the page with a strip of feed bag paper and closed the notebook. There was something I needed to understand about that field before I read any further. The southeast field looked worse in person than it did from the barn window. I walked it on a Thursday morning in late October, the ground still holding the cold from the night before.

 My boots leaving prints in the pale crust that formed between the clumps of sparse grass. The soil had a particular color I’d started to recognize, not the dark chocolate of the good acres near the house, not even the tired clay brown of the low pasture. This was bone white with a grayish cast, the way a beach looks after the tide pulls back and leaves mineral deposits on everything it touched.

In some places the crust was thick enough that it cracked when I stepped on it, and underneath it the soil was almost powdery, fine as flour, alkaline smelling. I crouched down and picked up a handful. It ran through my fingers like salt, not figuratively. I pressed a small amount to the tip of my tongue and tasted it, sharp, metallic.

The mineral bite of something the land had pulled up from below over a very long time, or something that had been pushed into it from above. I didn’t know which yet. What I did know was that the field wasn’t entirely dead. There were patches, maybe six or eight of them, ranging in size from a few square feet to something closer to 20, where something was actually growing.

 Not the thin, bleached volunteer grass that barely qualified as alive in the rest of the field. This was different, denser, lower to the ground, a gray-green that was almost silver in the flat morning light. It grew in tight mats close to the soil, and when I pushed my boot against it, it didn’t give the way ordinary grass gives, it held.

 I pulled a small clump of it loose and held it up. The roots were extraordinary, long and fibrous, reaching down much farther than a plant this small had any right to reach, and they had a faint smell to them, clean and sharp, something between pine resin and turned earth after rain. I didn’t know what it was. I was reasonably certain I had never seen it before, but my grandfather had seen it. He’d watched for it.

 He’d marked which season it first appeared in a particular corner of the field. He described its color in November and again in April. He’d been waiting for it or something like it for years before it came. The Italian neighbor’s mailbox was just under 3/4 of a mile down the county road tucked at the end of a gravel drive behind a pair of old hackberry trees.

I’d driven past it 40 or 50 times since August. The man who lived there had never once lifted his hand from the steering wheel when our vehicles passed each other. I stood in the middle of that pale field with a clump of silver-gray grass in my hand and I thought about what it means to wave at someone.

 His name was on the rural box in faded black paint, a long Italian surname with a hyphen and a trailing initial. I had looked it up in the county register the week before not because I planned to knock on his door but because it seemed like the kind of thing I should know. He’d owned his 43 acres since 1987. Before him a different name held the deed.

 Someone who’d sold cheap and moved to Tucson according to the register. Before that going back to 1951 a third family altogether. None of these names crossed into my grandfather’s notebooks. Not once. I drove down to his gravel drive on a Thursday afternoon in the second week of October. I had the clump of grass wrapped in a damp cloth in a coffee tin on the passenger seat.

 I rehearsed nothing. I am not good at rehearsing. The farmhouse was smaller than it looked from the road. White clapboard one story. A covered porch with a metal glider that had been repainted recently. Some clean shade of forest green. There was a dog behind a wire fence along the side yard.

 A large one dark brown who watched me without barking. That seemed like a good sign. I knocked. I waited. He opened the door in the way that people open doors when they’ve watched you park from a window. No surprise on his face. No hesitation. He was older than I’d expected from the shape I’d seen driving past, maybe 75, with white hair cut short and hands that looked like they had spent decades doing work that left marks.

He looked at me without speaking. I said I was the Halvorson girl, the one who’d taken the old Halvorson parcel on Route 9. I said my grandfather had left notebooks that mentioned his land specifically, and that I’d found something in my east field I couldn’t identify, and I wondered if he might recognize it.

 He looked at the coffee tin, then he looked at me. He said, in an accent that was thinner than I expected, worn down by decades in this county, that he had wondered when someone from that farm would finally come over. I didn’t know what to say to that. He stepped aside and held the door open, and I followed him into a kitchen that smelled of coffee and something herbal I couldn’t name, something dry and faintly medicinal that hung in the warm air like it had been there a long time.

 On the kitchen table, there was a book open, face down to hold the page. The walls had framed photographs, aerial shots I realized after a moment, of farmland, black and white, taken from above. One of them showed a field with a pale, irregular patch at its eastern edge, a shape I recognized before I could say why.

 He pulled out a chair for me and went to fill a second cup of coffee. He didn’t ask how I took it. He set the coffee in front of me without asking, the way people do when they’ve had enough company to know it doesn’t matter. Black. I wrapped both hands around the mug and looked at the aerial photograph on the wall, the one with the pale, irregular patch, and tried to orient myself inside it.

 The angle was strange, the way aerial photographs always are, flattening everything you know into a diagram of itself. But the shape of the pale area, the way it spread wider at the south end and tapered toward the north, that shape I had been staring at from ground level for 6 weeks. He sat down across from me and looked at the coffee tin I’d set on the table.

 He said that photograph was taken in 1974 by a county agricultural survey plane. He said his father had gotten a copy from the extension office and framed it because he thought it was proof of something. I asked, “Proof of what?” He turned his mug in a slow half circle thinking about how to begin. He told me that the pale area in that photograph was not salt damage from the original brine well failure.

 He said everyone had assumed that the county, the neighboring farms, the bank that had written the land off as marginal. He said his father had assumed it too at first, but his had been a soil man. He had come from a region of Europe where soil was not taken for granted, where people paid close attention to what came up in the second and third year after disturbance, not just the first.

And in the second year after the brine leak, what came up on that east field was not nothing. He got up from the table without finishing the sentence. He went to a low bookshelf beside the window and came back with a binder, the kind with clear plastic sleeve pages, filled with handwritten notes on graph paper and what I slowly recognized as pressed plant samples, dried flat, taped down, labeled in small European script.

He opened it to a page near the middle. The sample was small, narrow leaves pale at the edges, labeled with a date, August 1962, and a name I couldn’t pronounce and a question mark after it. He said his father had never been able to identify it properly. No one at the extension office knew what it was.

 The university plant pathologist they contacted said it was likely a contaminant or a misidentification. His father had disagreed. He had written letters about it. The letters were not answered in any useful way. I looked at the sample, then at the coffee tin on the table. He reached over and lifted the tin’s lid himself and looked at the seeds inside for a long time.

 His expression didn’t change exactly, but something in the stillness of his face changed. He said, “These are older than 1962.” I asked him how he could know that. He didn’t answer immediately. He set the lid back on the tin carefully, the way you’d set a lid on something you weren’t sure you wanted open, and stood up.

 He crossed to the far side of the room, a narrow study really, books on every surface, a window fogged with condensation, and pulled a cardboard box from underneath a low table. Inside were folders. And inside the folders were photocopied pages. And inside those pages were lines and lines of handwritten German that meant nothing to me.

He set a stack of them on the table and put one photocopied page on top and pointed to a line near the bottom. He said his father had eventually found a partial reference, a naturalist’s field note from 1887, originally written in German, describing a plant observed in the alkaline flats along the eastern edge of a salt basin in what was then the Austrian Empire.

The naturalist had called it a regional anomaly. He had described it as tolerant of conditions that should, by ordinary botany, have precluded germination. He had also noted that farmers in the area seemed aware of it. That they called it something in a dialect that roughly translated to the patient one or possibly the one that waits.

The naturalist had pressed a specimen. The specimen matched the 1962 sample in the binder within tolerances his father found convincing. I sat with that for a moment. I said, “But how did it get to my field in Harlan County, Ohio?” He said he didn’t know. He said his father hadn’t known either.

 He said that was, in fact, the part that had bothered his father for years. Not what the plant was, but how it had arrived. Spores or seeds could travel. Yes, wind, birds, contaminated agricultural shipment, any number of vectors. But the specificity of it, appearing in one ruined field, not in adjacent fields, not spreading past its own boundary in a decade of observation, that was not typical dispersal behavior.

His father had written that it was, and he was quoting here, “behaving as though it already knew the site.” Outside the window, the sleet had sought fun to rain. I could hear it against the glass. Neither of us spoke for what felt like a full minute. Then I asked if his father had ever tested the soil in that field, not just the plant, the soil itself.

 He looked at me with something that wasn’t quite surprised, but was adjacent to it. He asked how I had known to ask that. I told him about the Mason jar, the sample from the east corner, the one my grandfather had sealed and labeled and stored in the root cellar where it wouldn’t be disturbed. The handwriting on the lid, the date, September 1959, three years before the first press sample in that binder.

 He sat down slowly. He said, “Your grandfather collected before my father did.” He stayed seated for a long moment. The binder still open across his knees. The rain was steady now against the window, and the light in his office had shifted to something flat and gray. He asked if I had the jar with me. I didn’t.

 I had left it in the root cellar, in the same corner where I’d found it, because something in me had resisted moving it until I understood what it was. Some instinct I couldn’t name had said, “Leave it where he put it.” He nodded like that was the right answer. He said his father had started collecting pressed specimens in 1962, which I had seen in the binder.

But he had been observing the field since 1958, watching it without collecting, trying to understand what he was looking at before he touched it. His field notes from those years were, he said, “The most careful writing his father ever produced, more careful than anything from his formal research career.

” He crossed to a low cabinet along the far wall, the kind with flat wide drawers, the kind made for maps. He opened the third drawer down and removed a folder, soft with age, held together with a rubber band that had gone brittle. He peeled the band away carefully. Inside were handwritten pages on yellow legal paper, the ink faded to brown at the edges.

 He read one passage aloud without explaining which year it was from. His father had written, “The soil in the affected area resists standard characterization. pH is within expected saline parameters, but microbial activity reads anomalously high for a zone of this salinity. Something is breaking down the salt load from beneath.

 I cannot identify the mechanism.” I thought about the handwriting on the Mason jar lid. September 1959, my grandfather had dated his sample to a full year into his observation, which meant he had been watching before that, just as the botanist’s father had been watching. Two men on the same piece of ground, in the same decade, neither knowing the other was there.

 The question of how that was possible sat in the room between us without either of us saying. Did I ask if his father’s notes mentioned anyone else, a neighbor, a farmer on the adjacent property, any name? He leafed through several pages slowly, with the practiced care of someone who had read them before and was reading them again differently. He stopped.

 He looked up. He said there was a line he had always read as a reference to a county surveyor, but now he was not sure. He read it to me. “The man from the east property came again this morning. He doesn’t speak much, but he watches the same way I do. I think he’s been here longer than I have.” Outside the rain had begun to ease.

 We sat with that sentence for a long moment. The rain had dropped to a thin sound against the window glass, the kind that doesn’t announce itself anymore, just persists. His father had written, “The man from the east property.” “My grandfather’s farm sat east of where the experimental plots had been. I knew this from the county survey map I had pulled from the courthouse records in February, the one showing the original parcel boundaries before the consolidation sale in 1987.

The geometry was not ambiguous. The east property was ours.” The botanist set the notebook down on the table between us, not closed, open to that page. I looked at the handwriting. It was small and compressed, the letters of a man who thought carefully before writing anything down. I recognized that quality.

 My grandfather’s journals had the same character. Nothing wasted, nothing performed. I asked what year that entry was dated. He checked the top of the page, March 1958. My grandfather had been on that land since 1954. He had bought it the year after he married my grandmother, with money he had saved across three years of working at a grain elevator in Waukesha.

 I knew this from a letter my grandmother had written to her sister and never sent, which I found folded inside the back cover of her recipe box. He had been watching the east field, that gray, salt-heavy ground that nobody farmed and nobody wanted, since before he had any scientific language for what he was observing, since before, apparently, he had ever introduced himself to the man who would have understood exactly what he was watching.

 Two men, same field, adjacent properties, overlapping years of observation. Neither one speaking to the other about what he saw, except in private notebooks that would not meet until 60-something years later in a kitchen in Walworth County, in the hands of people who had inherited both the land and the silence. I asked if his father had ever mentioned why he stopped the work.

 The botanist was quiet for a moment. Then he said the last entry in the notebook was dated November 1961. After that, nothing. His father had moved the family to Madison for a university position in the spring of 1962 and had never come back to the land. He had kept the notebook but had never, as far as his son knew, spoken about it again. November 1961.

My grandfather sample jar was dated September 1959. I had assumed, without evidence, that the dating meant he had stopped paying attention around that time. But there was no reason to assume that. A man who watches carefully enough to seal a grass sample in a Mason jar and label it with a month and year is not the kind of man who stops watching.

I thought about what else might be in the barn. The barn had been locked since before I arrived. Not padlocked. There was no hasp on the door. But swelled shut from moisture and age, the bottom rail dragged into the earth a full 2 in. And nobody had forced it in the time I’d been there because the barn I used for the goats and the hay was the newer one, the 1978 edition my grandfather had built east of the house.

 And the old barn sat 60 yd further north with its gambrel roof and its graying boards and its one window boarded from the inside. I had assumed storage, old equipment, broken things, the sediment that collects in any farm structure that stops being primary. I had not assumed a second layer of documentation. I went out that afternoon.

 It was cold, February still, the ground firm enough to walk without sinking. I brought a pry bar from the equipment shed. The door gave after 4 minutes of working the bottom rail, the wood exhaling a smell that was part animal and part paper and part something mineral I couldn’t name. Inside, a 1952 Allis-Chalmers WD that hadn’t moved in decades, both rear tires flat and cracked, a corn sheller mounted on a post, chains hanging from the ceiling joists in three different lengths, and along the north wall, on a shelf built from rough sawn oak, 11

mason jars. Not the same as the one from the cellar. These were older, the embossed glass, not the smooth kind, which put them at an earlier manufacture, 1940s most likely. Each one held something different. Soil in some, root matter in two, what looked like dried seed heads in others. And each one had a paper label, water stained but readable in my grandfather’s hand.

 The dates ran from August 1955 to October 1963. He had not stopped in 1959. He had continued for four more years at minimum. The September 1959 jar in the cellar had not been the last. It had simply been the one that migrated indoors at some point. Probably brought to the house for closer examination and never returned.

 The rest were still here. I stood in the cold of the barn and counted. 11 jars. Eight years of collection if I took the dates at face value, and the last one, the October 1963 jar, held something different from all the others. Not soil, not roots, not seed. Inside it, folded four times into a tight square, was a piece of paper.

 I didn’t open the jar that day. I carried it to the kitchen, set it on the table beside the notebooks, and sat down across from it in the way you sit across from something you’re not ready to touch yet. The winter light through the south window was already going flat and pale. I opened the jar the next morning.

 The paper inside had dried into the shape of its folds, creased so sharply along each seam that I had to smooth it against the table with the flat of the my palm before the words came clear. The handwriting was my grandfather’s. I knew it by then the way you know a voice, but smaller than usual, more careful, the letters pressed close together as though he was rationing space.

 It was dated October 14, 1963. He would have been 31 years old. If you are reading this, you found the rest of them. That means you understood what you were looking at, which means you are the right person to have found them. I didn’t write this for anyone in particular. I wrote it because I wanted someone to know that I wasn’t wrong.

 The soil came back. Not [clears throat] all of it, not evenly, not fast, but it came back. The northeast field greened in the spring of 1961. I didn’t tell anyone because I didn’t want them in it yet. I needed to understand why before I let the county extension office turn it into a project. The grass that came first was not grass I planted.

 I think the seeds were already there underneath waiting for the salt to thin enough to let them through. Eight years. That’s how long it took for the salt to thin enough. I don’t know if that is fast or slow. I have nothing to compare it to. What I know is this. The land was not dead. It was waiting. I read it twice.

 Then I set it down and looked out at the northeast field through the kitchen window. It was March. The ground was still half frozen, the color of old pewter, but I knew what was under there now. Not just salt, not just dormancy, but a specific kind of patience that had been proven once already, 60 years before I arrived. I did not call the extension office that day.

 I did not call the buyer from Harlan County who had phoned twice more in January and not again since February. I went out to the field in my grandfather’s barn coat with a trowel and I dug 6 in down in three different spots along the northeast edge. The soil was dark, darker than the corners, darker than it had any right to be after everything it had absorbed.

 Something was happening in it. I don’t know yet what the spring will show me, but I know now that the land was never ruined. It was just in the middle of a process that nobody waited long enough to see finished. My grandfather waited. He just didn’t live to tell anyone. I’m going to tell everyone.

 If you’ve got an old field, an old drawer, an old building you haven’t opened, go look. Leave a comment below and tell me what you find. Subscribe if you want to see what comes up in that northeast corner come April. I’ll be there.

 

Disclaimer : This content may be created by AI for entertainment purposes. Any resemblance to real persons, events, or places is coincidental.